Transportation was important for the developing nation in
the late-18th and early-19th centuries. Goods were
transported to port towns and markets, citizens traveled to court, families
visited, and landowners traveled to their various landholdings. This is just a
sampling of the reasons for travel along America’s early roads. Many of these roads led to ferries that were
established at river crossings where the water was too deep to ford. A number
of ferries could be found along the Potomac River, which separates Maryland from Virginia.
Conn's Ferry Landing Now a Boat Ramp at Riverbend Park
|
|
In the 1790s, Hugh Conn established a ferry across the
Potomac River two miles above Great
Falls. In 1790 he purchased 15 acres on the river from
Joseph Porter and 50 acres, likely adjoining, from George Viall (Veal, Viley).[1]
Conn later purchased Porter’s half interest in the land his wife and
sister-in-law inherited from their father James Carter, who was the original
land grant owner.[2] This
collection of land, about 150 acres, made up what Conn referred to as his tract of land at the
ferry.[3]
In October 1793, Hugh Conn, along with other Potomac River ferrymen,
was required to keep travelers who may have yellow fever from entering Virginia. The governor of Virginia
wrote to the Justices of Loudoun County requiring
them to adopt some safe Mode for preventing the Introduction of the
Pestilential disease (which now prevails in the city of Philadelphia
the Granadies and the Island
of Tobago) Into this
State. At this time, Conn’s ferry was
within the bounds of Loudoun
County. The Justices
called court and recommended that the magistrates establish regulations that there be stationed at each ferry a
sergeant or corporal and four men whose duty would be to examine all persons
who attempt to cross the river for satisfactory proof that they did not come
from Philadelphia or its vicinity. If you were suspected of traveling from an
infected area, you were not allowed to cross the river into Virginia for six days. During that time,
your goods and baggage were exposed to the open air on the Maryland side of the river. If after six
days you did not show signs of disease, the traveler was permitted to cross the
river. If you suffered from some illness, a doctor was called to determine if
the disease was yellow fever, and if it was, the traveler was compelled to
return home. William Stanhope was appointed to make arrangements at Conn’s Ferry for
providing the provisions of the guardsmen; including access to a horse should
the doctor be needed. Stanhope could contract with anyone in the area who would
provide the best terms, and the governor of Virginia agreed to pay for the provisions
from the treasury. There were six other Potomac River ferries in Loudoun County that were also required to
quarantine travelers: Edward’s, Myer’s, Noland’s, Heator’s, Smith’s, and
Beltz’s ferries.[4]
Conn's Ferry Depicted on a Portion of Herman Boye's A Map of the State of Virginia: reduced from the nine sheet map of the state in conformity with law, 1828
Corrected 1858. Courtesy Library of Congress, Geography and Map Division
Conn's Ferry, located on the Potomac River north of Great Falls, is erroneously labeled Coon's Ferry.
|
|
When Irishman Isaac Weld, Jr. traveled through North America
and Canada in the late-18th
century he visited Great Falls,
which he described in one of a series of letters that he published in 1807.
Likely in the spring of 1796, Weld travelled from Montgomery Courthouse (now Rockville) to the Maryland
side of Great Falls.
He then proceeded upriver until he reached a ferry where he could cross the
river to view the falls from the Virginia
side. The ferry he took was probably Conn’s
ferry. Following is his description of the area:
|
|
Having followed the
highway as far as Montgomery court-house, which
is about thirty miles from Frederic, I turned off along a bye road running
through the woods, in order to see the great
falls of Patowmac River. The view of them from the Maryland shore is very
pleasing, but not so much as that from the opposite side. Having reached the
river therefore close to the Falls, I rode along through the woods, with which
its banks are covered, for some distance higher up, to a place where there was
a ferry, and where I crossed into Virginia.
From the place where I landed to the Falls, which is a distance of about three
miles, there is a wild romantic path running along the margin of the river, and
winding at the same time round the base of a high hill covered with lofty trees
and rocks. Near to the shore, almost the whole way, there are clusters of small
islands covered with trees, which suddenly opposing the rapid course of the
stream, form very dangerous eddies, in which boats are frequently lost when
navigated by men who are not active and careful. On the shore prodigious heaps
of white sand are washed up by the waves, and in many places the path is
rendered almost impassable by piles of large trees, which have been brought
down from the upper country by floods, and drifted together. The river, at the
ferry which I mentioned, is about one mile and a quarter wide, and it continues
much the same breadth as far as the Falls, where it is considerably contracted
and confined in its channel by immense rocks on either side. There also its
course is very suddenly altered, so much so indeed, that below the Falls for a
short distance it runs in an opposite direction from what it did above, but
soon after it resumes its former course. The water does not descend
perpendicularly, excepting in one part close to the Virginia shore, where the
height is about thirty feet, but comes rushing down with tremendous impetuosity
over a ledge of rocks in several different falls. The best view of the cataract
is from the top of a pile of rocks about sixty feet above the level of the
water, and which, owing to the bend in the river, is situated nearly opposite
to the Falls. The river comes from the right, then gradually turning,
precipitates itself down the Falls, and winds along at the foot of the rocks on
which you stand with great velocity. The rocks are of a slate colour, and lie
in strata; the surface of them in many places is glossy and sparkling.
-
Isaac Weld, Jun., 1796[5]
|
|
Conn
kept both a boat and a canoe at the ferry landing to facilitate the business.
He also used the land at the ferry to grow tobacco.[6]
Many area farmers; however, had switched to grain cultivation at this time due
to the high prices they were receiving for wheat and flour due to the European
war. (See Late 18th Century Tobacco.) While there is no known record
of Conn
keeping a tavern at his ferry, he was charged in court for retailing spirituous
liquors without a license.[7]
Ferry rates were established by the Virginia General
Assembly for each ferry. A typical rate in 1792 for a relatively easy crossing was
4 cents for each man and 4 cents for each horse. All other charges were based
on the rate for horses. Coaches, chariots, and wagons, inclusive of their
drivers, were charged at the same rate as six horses. Carts and four-wheeled
chaises or chairs were charged at the same rate as four horses. Two-wheeled
chaises or chairs were charged at the same rate as two horses. Each hogshead
(large barrel) of tobacco and each head of cattle was charged the same as one
horse. Smaller livestock, such as sheep, goats, lamb, and hogs, were assessed
at one-fifth part of the ferriage for one horse.[8]
When Hugh Conn died in 1806, he provided in his will for the
income from the ferry to support his widow, Susanna Conn, and their children.
However, if she remarried before the children reached 18 years of age, she
received the standard dower portion of 1/3rd of the land.[9]
She didn’t remarry during that period, and the ferry became known as Mrs. Conn’s
ferry.[10]
Hugh Conn’s will suggests that his family was living on other property he
owned, i.e. not the tract of land at the ferry, at the time of his death. This
other land was divided among his heirs, while the land at the ferry remained
jointly owned by his widow and children.[11]
In 1812, Susanna Conn, Rezin Elliott, Henry Conn, and Jesse
Conn, heirs of Hugh Conn, petitioned the Virginia General Assembly for a law to
legally establish a ferry across the Potomac River.
They acknowledged that Hugh Conn and they themselves, since Hugh Conn’s death,
kept a boat for the purpose of ferrying people over the Potomac
River. The ferry went from the land
of Hugh Conn in Virginia
to the lands belonging to the heirs of John Hawkins, deceased, in Maryland. The
petitioners stated several advantages for the ferry. They asserted that it was
the best and safest passage of the river between the little falls and Seneca;
that it shortened the distance from Baltimore to the intersection of the
Fauquier Turnpike (later known as the Warrenton Turnpike) and the Little River
Turnpike from ten to fifteen miles; that several citizens have real estate on
both sides of the river; and that the ferry afforded citizens a shorter and
more direct commercial route to the Baltimore market.[12]
The Virginia General Assembly passed an act authorizing Conn’s Ferry that same year.
|
|
Evidence suggests that Conn’s
ferry landing was located at the same place that is currently used as a boat
ramp at the Fairfax County Park Authority’s Riverbend Park.
Sketch Showing the Location of Conn's Ferry Based on Recent USGS Maps and Historical Surveys.
The location of the ferry landing on the Conn property is known from two sources. A
land dispute between Spencer Jackson and James Roberts, whose disagreement was
over the land just south of the ferry, resulted in a survey being made of that
property in November 1824. George Gunnell, who performed the surveyed, was
taken to Mrs. Conn’s ferry, which was the starting point
of his survey.[13]
The second source is an excellent survey plat prepared in
1818 when a canal was contemplated from Goose Creek
in Loudoun County
to Hunting Creek near Alexandria.
By this time, Mrs. Conn was living in a house on the north side
of the road leading to the ferry. The house was located up on a hill and had a
porch and nearby kitchen.[14]
Both the ferry crossing and Mrs.
Conn’s house are depicted on the
plat.[15]
(See Survey Plat at Library of Virginia.)
|
|
Conn’s Ferry achieved its
moment of fame during the War of 1812 when President Madison crossed the
Potomac at Conn’s Ferry on the morning of
August 26, 1814 during his flight from Washington
when the British burned many public buildings there. He and his party had
reached the river the night before, but were unable to cross due to bad
weather. Charles Ingersoll wrote in 1849 in his Historical Sketch of the Second War between the United States of
America and Great Britain that Madison
spent the night in a hovel in the woods before taking the ferry the next
morning.[16]
|
|
Hugh Conn was a slave owner, and likely had some of his
slaves working his tobacco and corn fields. Other slaves probably raised Conn’s farm animals, primarily hogs and dungle fowl
(chickens), though Conn
also had some steers, geese, turkeys, and ducks.[17]
The unpleasant sight of slaves toiling in nearby tobacco
fields was noted by Isaac Weld Jr. when he traveled from Frederick,
Maryland to the Great Falls in 1796. Near Frederick he observed that the fields of the
German immigrants were well cultivated and green with wheat. However, as he
travelled through Montgomery County, Maryland and got closer to the Great Falls he saw a disappointing change in
farm management.
|
|
…large pieces of land,
which have been worn out with the culture of tobacco, are here seen lying
waste, with scarcely an herb to cover them. Instead of the furrows of the
plough, the marks of the hoe appear on the ground; the fields are overspread
with little hillocks for the reception of tobacco plants, and the eye is
assailed in every direction with the unpleasant sight of gangs of male and
female slaves toiling under the harsh commands of the overseer…[18]
|
|
At his death in 1806, Hugh Conn owned eleven slaves. His
estate inventory, appraised in 1809, valued the slaves from $3.34 to $333.34.
The slave deemed most valuable was a man named Ellick.[19]
He was about 27 years old at the time. When Conn’s estate was divided among his heirs,
Ellick was given to one of his daughters, though she was not yet of legal age.
Therefore, her mother, Susanna Conn, had responsibility over Ellick until her
daughter was old enough to manage her own affairs. In actuality, Mrs. Conn’s
son Jesse is known to have taken over this responsibility.
Jesse Conn, representing his mother, hired Ellick out to
James Hamilton, of Leesburg Virginia,
for $80 for the year of 1817. After having worked for Hamilton for about two weeks, Ellick was
arrested and convicted of breaking into the store of Mr. Joseph Beard. As
punishment he was whipped and burned in the hand. The jailor released Ellick
and told him to “clear yourself home you son of a bitch.” An observer to
Ellick’s whipping and subsequent release asked the jailer if Jesse Conn was
present, and the jailer replied that he didn’t believe he was. Ellick evidently
took this opportunity to escape.
About two months later, he was seen in Leesburg in the
company of two or three men who captured him. They placed him in the Leesburg
jail overnight, then retrieved him in the morning and continued on to Mrs. Conn’s
house at the ferry.
Once there, a couple of hours before sunset, the men entered
the house to converse with Mrs.
Conn, who had been lying down at
the time. Ellick had been handcuffed and was left outside at the edge of the
porch. Mrs. Conn refused to take charge of Ellick since
her son was not at home. She sent a servant to Great Falls to ask Jesse Conn to return and
handle the matter. At one half hour before sunset, a servant boy came into the
house and told the men, who had been dining at the time, that Ellick had gone
over the hill. The men jumped up and asked which way they should pursue him. Mrs. Conn
told them he most likely had gone towards the river.
At the ferry, the men met up with Jesse Conn and inquired if
Mr. Conn
had seen a black man. They explained that they brought home a slave belonging
to the woman that lived in the house on the hill and that they were afraid that
he had run away. The men returned to the house and remained there all night and
the next morning insisted that they be paid for the expense of putting Ellick
in jail and for travel expenses. Mrs.
Conn refused to pay the men since
Ellick escaped before Jesse Conn arrived to take charge of him. The men alleged
that if they weren’t paid for these services that Ellick might even go back to
where he had been taken and no person would apprehend him. Jesse Conn then
allowed the men to take all of the money they found on Ellick (about $7) plus a
few dollars more in additional compensation. The demand for compensation, and
the threat that no one would expend effort in the future to return a slave to
the Conns if the men weren’t paid, suggests that the men may have been slave
hunters who were in the business of capturing and returning slaves for money.
On the second morning after Ellick escaped, Jesse Conn
traveled to Shepherdstown (now West Virginia)
in search of Ellick guessing that Ellick would go up the Potomac
River in a boat. Upon reaching the town, Conn did not hear anything about Ellick and
therefore had handbills printed offering a reward for Ellick’s return. He also
placed an advertisement in the August 30, 1817 National Intelligencer and
Washington Advertiser newspaper offering a reward for his return.
|
|
$30 reward for
runaway, negro Elleck, age about 35 yrs. – Jesse Conn, lvg in Fairfax County, Va.[20]
|
|
Ellick, overcoming great odds, was successful in his bid for
freedom. The Conn’s never saw Ellick again,
though there were some rumors that he had been seen in Alexandria, Virginia.
[21]
|
|
Hugh Conn’s heirs sold the tract at the ferry to John Coad
in November 1830.[22] He then
sold a 50-acre portion of the tract with the ferry to Henry Dawes the following
year.[23]
It is unknown when the ferry discontinued operations.
The land changed hands several times before being purchased
in 1909 by Dr. John Ladd.[24]
He built several cottages, buildings, and wells with well houses for the River
Bend Camp he operated there.[25]
|
[1] Loudoun
County Deed Book (LN DB) S:310, 312, August 19, 1790, Conn’s purchase of 15 acres on the river
from Joseph Porter. Also, LN DB T:179, 180, August 13, 1790, Conn’s purchase of 50 acres from George
Viall, who had purchased the land from Joseph Porter in 1787 (LN DB S:160, June
9, 1787, Joseph Parker to George Viall.)
[2] LN DB
U:48, May 9, 1792. Also LN DB W:142, September 9, 1795.
[3] Fairfax
County Will Book (FX WB) I1(658):524, written July 2, 1795, probated July 21,
1806.
[4] Loudoun County Order Book P, pages 272-273, including the unnumbered
page between 272 and 273.
[5] Isaac
Weld, Jun., Travels Through the Stated of
North America, and the Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, during the Years
1795, 1796, and 1797, Fourth Edition, Vol. I, Printed for John Stockdale, London, 1807. Courtesy
Library of Congress, American Memory.
[6] FX WB
J1(659):182, September 4, 1806, Appraisal on Inventory of Hugh Conn, deceased.
The boat and canoe were valued at $25 and the crop of tobacco at $48.
[7] Loudoun County
Order Book (LN OB) Q (Sept 1794 – Oct 1796),
p. 103.
[8] William
Waller Hening, Henings Statutes at Large,
Vol. 13, 1789-1792, William Brown Printer, Philadelphia, 1823, p. 565.
[9] Fairfax
County Will Book (FX WB) I1(658):524, written July 2, 1795, probated July 21,
1806.
[10] Fairfax
County Land Causes, page 103, November 11, 1824. Survey by George W. Gunnell of
an adjacent property in the suit of Spencer Jackson vs. James Roberts, Gunnell
notes that the plaintiff conducted him to Mrs.
Con’s Ferry on the Potomack.
[11] Fairfax
County Will Book (FX WB) I1(658):524, written July 2, 1795, probated July 21,
1806.
[12] Fairfax
County Legislative Petitions, December 11, 1812, microfilm, Fairfax County
Public Library, Virginia Room.
[13] Fairfax
County Land Causes, page 103, November 11, 1824. Survey by George W. Gunnell of
an adjacent property in the suit of Spencer Jackson vs. James Roberts, Gunnell
notes that the plaintiff conducted him to Mrs.
Con’s Ferry on the Potomack.
[14] Loudoun County Chancery Case M7213 (1827-039)
James H. Hamilton, et. al. vs. Susannah Conn, et. al, 1827; Also, Loudoun County Chancery Case M7213 (1827-039)
James H. Hamilton, et. al. vs. Susannah Conn, et. al, 1827.
[16] Anthony
s. Pitch, The Burning of Washington; The British Invasion of 1814, Navel
Institute Press, Annapolis,
Maryland, 1998. p. 128.
[17] Fairfax
County Will Book (FX WB) I1(658):524, written July 2, 1795, probated July 21,
1806.
[18] Isaac
Weld, Jun., Travels Through the Stated of
North America, and the Provinces of Upper and Lower Canada, during the Years
1795, 1796, and 1797, Fourth Edition, Vol. I, Printed for John Stockdale, London, 1807. Courtesy
Library of Congress, American Memory.
[19] Fairfax
County Will Book (FX WB) I1(658):524, written July 2, 1795, probated July 21,
1806.
[20] Joan M.
Dixon, National Intelligencer and Washington Advertiser
Newspaper Abstracts, 1814-1817, Heritage Books, 1997, p. 310. Data of
Advertisement was Saturday, August 30, 1817.
[21] Loudoun County Chancery Case M7213 (1827-039)
James H. Hamilton, et. al. vs. Susannah Conn, et. al, 1827.
[22] FX DB
Z2(52)324, 13 Nov 1830
[23] FX DB
A3(53)153, 31 Oct 1831
[24] FX DB
C7(159)573, 14 Jun 1909
[25] FX DB
T9(228)597, 12 Jun 1926
|